Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoKreatopolisLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente ¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Ideas Matter

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Macroeconomics and Finance
    • Microeconomics and Competitiveness
    • Politics and Institutions
    • Social Issues
  • Authors
  • Spanish

When Globalization and Populism Meet

October 6, 2017 by Steven Ambrus Leave a Comment


It amounts to an upheaval. Populist movements claiming to speak directly for the people and opposed to everything from bankers to immigrants and the institutions of liberal democracy have altered the political landscape in large areas of the world. Think Brexit in Great Britain, Syriza and Podemos in Greece and Spain, and the populist candidates in the most recent elections in the United States.

While these movements span the spectrum from left to right, their emergence is no accident. Rather according to Dani Rodrik, an economics professor at Harvard, the rise of populism  in recent times is a response to the economic dislocations and deep sense of unfairness that hard hit communities have felt in the latter stages of globalization, whether because of trade openings or the worldwide financial integration and its attendant crises.

Redistribution, as Rodrik made clear in a recent presentation at the IDB and a published paper, is but the other side of trade’s gains. But as globalization advances and increasingly targets the low trade barriers that remain, the rewards to society as a whole are small in comparison to the trade shocks experienced by specific industrial sectors and regions.

Consider NAFTA from the perspective of the United States. Mexican goods make up a small part of the U.S. market and the United States was already relatively open to them when the trade agreement went into force in 1994. So on the whole NAFTA generated tiny net benefits to the American economy. At the same time, according to a study by Shushanik Hokobyan and John McLaren covering the 1990-2000 period, a high-school dropout in regions heavily affected by NAFTA had an 8 percentage point slower wage growth than a similar worker not affected by the agreement. Meanwhile, wage growth fell 17% in the most protected industries compared to industries that were unprotected when the agreement went into affect.

Social insurance and labor market protections could have made the difference. Europe has been more open to trade for longer than the United States specifically because those protections exist. But the lack of such protections in the United States and the feeling that jobs are being lost to competition from countries around the world where labor, environmental and safety laws are not as respected generates deep resentment against the so-called elites interests that benefit. It has made globalization a particular focus of grievance, even compared to other forces like technological change and domestic competition that at the end of the day may have a bigger impact on wages and employment.

In Europe, meanwhile, financial globalization, which has made it hard to regulate credit markets and banks, has been a particularly potent source of frustration. Borrowers in Greece, Spain, and Portugal, facing lower risk premia because of monetary unification and the introduction of the Euro in 1999 racked up large amounts of external debt as they invested in construction and other non-tradable sectors. That led to crisis when credit dried up in the wake of the U.S. housing collapse, fuelling anger at the resulting downturn.

In parts of Latin America “rapid trade opening, financial crises, IMF programs and entry by foreign corporations in sensitive domestic sectors, like mining or public utilities,” have resulted in their own particular brew of bitterness, writes Rodrik in his study.

What unites people in these regions is their ire: the feeling that globalization has unleashed a loss of autonomy over economic policy at the national level and sacrificed employment and wages in the process. It is the frustration that as control over everything from capital to industrial policy has been forfeited, inequality has grown and economic security has been threatened.

Those grievances don’t necessarily take the same form. In Latin America and in the southern European countries of Greece and Spain, where trade, foreign investment and financial crises have caused the big dislocations, populism has been of the left-wing variety, Rodrik says. That means in Latin America, targeting institutions like the IMF and in southern Europe, lashing out at the euro, Brussels or Germany, he says. Meanwhile, in northern Europe some people fear, among other things, that their generous welfare system is under attack from racially, religously or culturally-different immigrants. And they have responded with an ethno-nationalist, right-wing populism with anti-immigrant overtones. The United States seems to have a mixture of both the left and right-wing varieties.

How this all ends is anybody’s guess. Globalization has had dramatically positive effects in expanding opportunities for exporters, investors, multinational companies and others involved in international trade. It has fostered growth and helped reduce inequality in at least some poorer countries. But it is important, says Rodrik, to prevent the worst expressions of populism from taking shape, including those that would erode liberal democracy and the open world economy. For that to happen, he argues, there has to be some move back to greater national autonomy over economic affairs.

 


Filed Under: Macroeconomics and Finance, Politics and Institutions, Social Issues Tagged With: #globalization, #populism, #Trade, #unemployment, #wages

Steven Ambrus

Steven Ambrus worked as a correspondent for US and European media during two decades in Latin America, covering politics, education, the environment and other issues. He currently works in the communications and publications unit of the Research Department at the IDB.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Related posts

  • The Collapse of Trust and the Rise of Populism
  • BREXIT: What Does It Mean for Latin America and the Caribbean?
  • Latin America and Trump: the IDB’s Chief Economist Identifies Potential Opportunities for the Region
  • The Policy Conundrum in Latin America and the Caribbean: Let’s Revisit the Trade Agenda!
  • IDB-Columbia Course for Policymakers Opens for Applications

About this blog

The blog of the IDB's Research Department shares ideas that matter on public policy and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube