Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Ideas Matter

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Macroeconomics and Finance
    • Microeconomics and Competitiveness
    • Politics and Institutions
    • Social Issues
  • Authors
  • Spanish

Who Decides the Budget?

February 4, 2015 by Carlos Scartascini Leave a Comment


President Obama presented his $4 trillion budget proposal for FY2016 to Congress on Feb. 2, outlining his spending priorities for the next 10 years. Big winners under his plan include the poor, middle classes, the military and the construction industry, thanks to a combination of tax breaks and credits, as well as infrastructure and defense spending. On the other hand, the wealthy and businesses operating abroad as well as deficit hawks would be on the losing end of the proposal. Not surprisingly, the Republican-led Congress balked at the proposal and the lines of battle are drawn. What’s the next step? Who really decides the budget?

In the U.S., the Congress plays an essential role in budget decisions. This is why the president has to negotiate with Congress and why, on many occasions, Congress gets its way. In Latin American countries, despite having a presidential system very similar to that of the U.S., as well as a budget process that is officially similar, the role of the legislature tends to be very different. In general, just as other areas of government have been characterized by “hyper-presidentialism”, so too has the budget process.

So, Who Decides the Budget? That is the key topic covered in the Research Department’s book, which analyzes the budget process in eight countries in Latin America. It finds that in most of them the Congress plays a secondary (sometimes negligible) role in budget decisions.

Several mechanisms are used in the region to curb Congressional action in the budget-formulation process. First, fiscal rules are in place to restrict what the Congress can do during the approval stage. For example, while only some countries grant Congress the ability to increase or make unlimited changes to the budget like in the U.S., in countries such as Brazil, Mexico, and Peru, the Congress can only reallocate budget items so long as the fiscal accounts balance proposed by the Executive Branch doesn’t change. In Chile, the Congress faces even greater restrictions, since it only has authorization to reduce spending.

There are other ways that the Executive Branch can adversely affect Congress’ ability to act. One of them is by giving Congress little time to analyze and approve the budget. This problem is compounded by the limited ability of some Congresses to evaluate the Executive Branch’s agenda.

In light of the low capacity of Congress, another way in which the Executive Branch dominates the process is by under/overestimating income. Generally, all countries have contingency plans in the event of a shortage or surplus. In some cases, if resources turn out to be lower than budgeted, the Executive Branch has the power to make spending cuts at its discretion (Brazil). In other cases, if resources turn out to be greater than budgeted, the Executive Branch has the power to allocate them as it sees fit (Argentina and Bolivia, among others). These powers have led to countries overestimating or underestimating income at their discretion which, thanks in large part to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), does not happen in the U.S., where errors of this type are few and far between.

One interesting result that has come from analyzing presidential powers is that the increase in budgetary powers of the Executive Branch, previously thought to reduce spending, has not necessarily achieved the desired objective. Although stripping Congressmen of their privileges to include additional expenditures in the budget was intended to reduce spending (since they have an incentive to engage in pork-barrel spending), presidents appear to have succumbed to the temptation to increase spending themselves, since they now have greater control over where expenditures are allocated. This outcome is covered in the working paper entitled “The Economic Effects of Constitutions: Do Budget Institutions Make Forms of Government More Alike?”, whose detailed analysis we will leave for another post.


Filed Under: Politics and Institutions Tagged With: #budget, #FY14, #Obama

Carlos Scartascini

Carlos Scartascini is Head of the Development Research Group at the Research Department and Leader of the Behavioral Economics Group of the Inter-American Development Bank. He has published eight books and more than 60 articles in academic journals and edited volumes. He is a member of the Executive Committee of IDB's Gender and Diversity Lab, member of the Board of Advisors of the Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, Associate Editor of the academic journal Economía, and Founding Member of LACEA's BRAIN (Behavioral Insights Network). A native of Argentina, Dr. Scartascini holds a Ph.D. and an M.A. in Economics from George Mason University.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Related posts

  • House of Cards, Latin American Style
  • A Fresh Look at Policymaking in Latin America
  • Reforming the Civil Service to Win Elections
  • Fiscal Discipline: Can Constitutions Help?
  • Revisiting Policymaking in a Troubled Region

About this blog

The blog of the IDB's Research Department shares ideas that matter on public policy and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
To learn more about cookies, click here
X
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT