Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Ideas Matter

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Macroeconomics and Finance
    • Microeconomics and Competitiveness
    • Politics and Institutions
    • Social Issues
  • Authors
  • Spanish
When it comes to climate policy, the expensive options are sometimes the most effective

Climate Policy: When the Expensive Options Make Sense

April 13, 2018 by Adrien Vogt-Schilb 2 Comments


To stabilize climate change, we need to get to zero net carbon emissions by the end of the century. A key question then for policymakers is when and how to reduce emissions.

Imagine you are a policymaker, and you have two options for reducing emissions. Energy efficiency measures in the building sector (LED lights instead of light bulbs, better thermal insulation) can reduce emissions for $12 per avoided ton of carbon. Replacing gasoline-powered cars with electric vehicles or public transit would reduce carbon emissions for $21 per avoided ton. Which option should you choose?

Common sense, and traditional climate economics models, would recommend taking advantage of the cheapest opportunities first – the so called low-hanging fruits– and keeping the most difficult ones for later.

To achieve zero emissions, we need to prioritize expensive policies

But common sense sometimes gets it wrong. In a recent paper in the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Guy Meunier, Stephane Hallegatte and I find that starting with the most expensive option can make sense. To get to zero emissions, we will eventually need to rely on ambitious changes, like driving electric cars, or using public transport much more than we currently do. Those changes will take time, probably several decades. We thus need to start investing in those changes now, even before cheaper options have been exhausted.

Instead of just selecting the lowest cost options, our findings suggest that governments should work backwards from their decarbonization goal, and think about the short-term investments that can put the economy on track to reach it:

  • First,consider a long-term objective consistent with the Paris Agreement, such as reducing emissions by 50 percent by 2050, and derive sectorial objectives consistent with that. For instance, halving emissions may require retrofitting all buildings and transforming transportation systems.
  • Then, establish actionable short-term targets to put your country on track to achieve these sectorial objectives. For instance, retrofitting all buildings by 2050 may be achieved at a low cost if by 2022 all new buildings are energy efficient.
  • Finally, design the combination of policies and regulatory changes – from performance standards to innovation subsidies and infrastructure investment – that are able to effectively achieve those targets.

Investing early in climate change brings down cost

Climate change experts already accept that investing early in relatively expensive emissions reduction technologies may be justified as a way of bringing down their costs. For instance, the costs of batteries, electric vehicles, solar panels, LED lights, and windmills have all fallen dramatically over the last decade because businesses have identified new and more efficient ways to produce, sell or install them. This learning by doing phenomenon (as economists call it) means that investing early makes sense: if governments had not started supporting those technologies when they were expensive, their cost would not have dropped as much as it has.

How is our approach new? The answer is a bit technical: we improved the way emissions reductions are represented in the economic models that academics have been using for almost three decades.  The traditional model relies on marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves, which provide information on emissions reduction potential, and costs (or benefits) for different technologies. But that model doesn’t provide information on how long those emissions reductions take to achieve and how long they persist. So, according to the model, if you pay for electric cars in 2018, that would reduce carbon emissions in 2018; but if you stopped buying electric cars in 2019, carbon emissions would immediately rebound to their previous level.

We make a simple change in that model: we represent emissions reductions as investments with long-term consequences on emissions. Replacing a gasoline car with an electric car reduces emissions for a decade. Windmills reduce emissions for 40 years.

We also introduce nonlinear investment costs, which economists call adjustment costs: low-carbon investments are more expensive if they are rushed than if they are smoothed over time. Imagine you want to retrofit all buildings with great thermal insulation and efficient appliances. It would be cheaper to do that over a couple of decades, making use of the existing industry and skilled workers, rather than rushing it over a year, which could require diverting a substantial share of the workforce and capital away from other productive uses in the economy.

In short, expensive options may be worthwhile if they require a long time to scale up or they endure. Climate-smart cities, in which it is easier to move from place to place on foot or by bike than in urban sprawls, are maybe the most relevant example: they may take decades to build and  would lock in environmental benefits for centuries.  The key is taking the long-term view and considering expense in the broadest time frame possible.

 Note: A  long version of this blog was initially posted at voxEU


Filed Under: Environment and Climate Change Tagged With: #AlternativeEnergy, #CarbonEmissions, #ClimateChange, #EnergyEfficiency, #ParisAgreement

Adrien Vogt-Schilb

Adrien Vogt-Schilb is a senior climate change economist at the Inter-American Development Bank, in the Chile office. Adrien's work focuses on the design of effective and politically acceptable climate strategies. He develops tools to align decarbonization policies with development goals in all sectors and to manage political economy issues in the transition to net-zero – including labor, social and fiscal impacts. Adrien also works on methods to build socio-economic resilience to uncertain climate change impacts, and to facilitate the co-construction of public policies involving a variety of stakeholders with different objectives. Adrien is a trained engineer, holds a PhD in economics and is the author of 7 books or monographs, and more than 30 academic papers on climate change and development. He tweets @vogt_schilb

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Onika Stellingburg says

    April 13, 2018 at 4:40 pm

    Interesting and informative blog piece on reaching our international climate change goals. I believe also needed in this narrative is a sector specific approach. Emissions from fossil fuels attributable to vehicle and energy make up only a portion of global emissions. Countries need to start considering making other sectors (food [waste], water [harvesting] shipping and aviation, industry etc) aligned to emissions reduction in line with their national capabilities.
    We also need to have greater involvement of the private sector. Governments do not have the finances needed to push the change required. Private sector involvement could help solve some of these issues.
    Just my two cents.

    Reply
    • Tom Sarrazin says

      April 17, 2018 at 2:41 pm

      Agreed, Onika. All stakeholders need to come together if we are to achieve our climate goals.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Related posts

  • Can We Reduce Emissions While We Wait for a Carbon Tax?
  • Strengthening Climate Goals Will End Up Saving Money for Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Electric Vehicles: Towards Clean and Affordable Transportation
  • Modeling Tradeoffs in the Fight Against Climate Change
  • Achieving Climate Change Goals Means Redirecting 7 to 19% of GDP Worth of Spending Decisions

About this blog

The blog of the IDB's Research Department shares ideas that matter on public policy and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
To learn more about cookies, click here
X
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT