Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Sostenibilidad

Just another web-blogs Sites site

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Agriculture and Food Security
    • Climate change
    • Ecosystems and Biodiversity
    • Environmental and Social Safeguards
    • Infrastructure and Sustainable Landscapes
    • Institutionality
    • Responsible Production and Consumption
  • Authors
  • English
    • Español

Energy subsidy reform in Ecuador could yield social, fiscal and climate benefits

August 15, 2019 por Adrien Vogt-Schilb - Rafael Soria Leave a Comment


We often hear that the fight against climate change is one of the most urgent priorities for the region. But consider the case of Ecuador. The country is going through fiscal and social difficulties. Can countries like Ecuador attend all three fiscal, social and environmental priorities at once? While it is not an easy task, a recent IDB study suggests that carefully replacing energy subsidies with better social protection spending could be a way for governments to make progress on all three fronts.

Over the last decade, the government of Ecuador has spent as much as 7% of its budget – or US$ 2.3 billion per year – to subsidize gasoline, diesel, electricity and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The savings generated from removing fossil fuel subsidies could be used to reduce deficits and sovereign debt, cut other taxes, or fund investments in education, health or infrastructure.

Removing subsidies would also help to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels which contribute to air pollution and represent a big source of greenhouse gas emissions. The IMF estimates that together the social cost of global warming, air pollution, accidents and road damage caused by the over-utilization of subsidized energy in Ecuador is three times greater than the fiscal cost of energy subsidies.

The problem is that reducing fossil fuel subsidies can be politically challenging, as the yellow vest protests in France and the Gasolinazo in Mexico demonstrate.

Indeed, our study shows that poor vulnerable households in Ecuador would be negatively affected by removing energy subsidies. Removing LPG subsidies would cost poor households (defined as those in the bottom 40% of the population) between 2.5% and 3% of their income. Removing subsidies on electricity and diesel would cost them about 2% of their income. Even if they don’t consume diesel directly, poor Ecuadorians are vulnerable to food and public transport price hikes due to removing diesel subsidies. While poorer Ecuadorians do not tend to consume as much gasoline as richer ones since they are much less likely to own a car, removing gasoline subsidies would still cost them 1 to 1.5% of their revenue.

If energy subsidies benefit poor households, why would a development bank argue they should be removed? Because energy subsidies are incredibly expensive and fail to discriminate against poor and rich households. Since richer households consume more, subsidies tend to benefit rich households the most. In Ecuador, it costs $15.5 to transfer $1 to poor households using gasoline subsidies, $8.5 using electricity and $7.8 using diesel subsidies. LPG subsidies are the least inefficient, as households from all income levels have a similar consumption of it, but they still cost the government $5.2 for each dollar transferred to a poor household.

The challenge is therefore getting rid of energy subsidies while protecting poor households. Lessons learned from around the world suggest that one way is to give some of the government savings from subsidy removal back to households. In Ecuador, the Bono de Desarrollo Humano (Human Development Bond) could be a solution. Internationally, cash transfers are one of the best tools to deliver social assistance. They tend to increase health, employment and welfare indicators while being economically efficient. In Ecuador, it costs the government about $2 to disburse $1 to a poor household using the Bono, which is considerably cheaper than energy subsidies.

Reducing energy subsidies while protecting poor households

An increase of the Bono’s disbursements by $46/month would be enough to compensate poor Ecuadorians for the average impact of removing all energy subsidies. In addition, increasing the Bono would cost less than what energy subsidies currently cost, which means that the government would save $1.3 billion per year. This money could be used to reduce the deficit, stimulate the economy, or fund other social development priorities.

And we explore even better ideas. Consider the following deal:

  • Gasoline and electricity subsidies are replaced by a $17 increase of the Bono disbursements
  • Diesel subsidies are removed, but public transport is made free for poor Ecuadorians
  • LPG subsidies are removed, but all poor households get one free cylinder per month

We find these proposals would leave poor Ecuadorians better off economically, compared to the present situation, and would save the government about $1.6 billion per year. Encouragingly, this package could gain traction politically, according to experts we interviewed for the study.

Our paper stems from an academic collaboration between German researchers, Ecuador’s Escuela Politécnica Nacional and the IDB’s Climate Change Division. The study is only as good as the data available, so our results should be interpreted with caution. It also does not cover all aspects that governments should consider before removing subsidies. For instance, we only analyze the impact on consumers, while some firms and workers could also be exposed to the negative impacts of subsidy removal.

Nonetheless, our study demonstrates again that energy subsidies are expensive, inefficient and counterproductive. Reforming them to save money, help poor households, and reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions is a step that all countries at any income level can consider to kickstart a just transition towards inclusive and sustainable development.

 

This article was co-authored by Adrien Vogt-Schilb and guest author, Rafael Soria, from the Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador.

 

 

Foto Copyright: alh1 – Flickr


Filed Under: Climate change

Adrien Vogt-Schilb

Adrien Vogt-Schilb is a senior climate change economist at the Inter-American Development Bank, in the Chile office. Adrien's work focuses on the design of effective and politically acceptable climate strategies. He develops tools to align climate policies with development goals in all sectors and to manage political economy issues in the transition to net-zero – including labor, social and fiscal impacts. Adrien is a trained engineer, holds a PhD in economics and is the author of 8 books or monographs, and more than 40 academic papers on climate change and development. He posts about his research on his LinkedIn account https://www.linkedin.com/in/adrien-vogt-schilb/

Rafael Soria

Rafael Soria is a specialist in Energy Planning, renewable energy and environment. He graduated as a mechanical engineer at the National Polytechnic School, Quito - Ecuador. He was formed as a Master and Doctor of Science in Energy Planning from the School of Engineering of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (COPPE / UFRJ) - Brazil. He completed part of his doctoral studies at the German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Applied Thermodynamics. He is currently an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering of the National Polytechnic School, and teaches undergraduate, masters and doctorate classes. His research areas are: Energy Policy, Energy Economics, Energy Efficiency Technologies, Integrated Energy Planning, Energy-Environment and Society, Energy Systems Design, Climate Change Mitigation. It has 14 scientific Q1 publications, book chapters and international conferences. He has participated in consulting teams hired by IADB, Petrobras, EPE, FINEP, British Embassy, GIZ, OLADE, MEER, MAE, Bariloche Foundation, Greenpeace, etc.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

SEARCH

Sustainability

This blog is a space to reflect about the challenges, opportunities and the progress made by Latin American and Caribbean countries on the path towards the region’s sustainable development.

SIMILAR POSTS

  • Is there an affordable way to make voters love energy price hikes?
  • How cash transfers can support the fight against climate change
  • Do electric cars really reduce CO2 emissions?
  • What can Carbon Prices Achieve in Latin America and the Caribbean?
  • Improved Cook Stoves for Rural Communities in Honduras

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

    Blog posts written by Bank employees:

    Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


    For blogs written by external parties:

    For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

    The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

    Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



    Privacy Policy

    Derechos de autor © 2025 · Magazine Pro en Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

    Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

    Aviso Legal

    Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

    facebook
    twitter
    youtube
    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
    To learn more about cookies, click here
    x
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT