Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Beyond Borders

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Asia – LAC
    • Innovation and Technology
    • Investment Attraction
    • Public-Private Alliances
    • Regional Cooperation
    • Regional Integration
    • Trade & Investment Agreements
    • Trade Facilitation
    • Trade Promotion
  • Authors
  • Spanish

How long does it take to cross borders? From surveys and one-dimensional measures to big data

August 17, 2017 by Christian Volpe Martincus - Jerónimo Carballo 1 Comment


To learn more about this issue, see chapter 1 of Out Of the Border Labyrinth, a report published by the IDB’s Integration and Trade Sector, and IDB Working Paper series no. IDB-WP-782, Endogenous Border Times.

In recent years, various indicators have been developed to measure time at the border. In general, these measures are based on surveys of international freight transportation companies and are one-dimensional, which is to say that they reflect a single value for each country.

Current measures of time at the border

The best-known indicators are: (1) the number of days it takes to trade across borders from the Doing Business (DB) index and (2) the Logistics Performance Index (LPI), both of which are published by the World Bank. The latest issue of the DB reports on internal transportation times and the time needed to comply with paperwork and other formalities at the border. The LPI reports on the time it takes for goods to go from the supplier’s factory to the port/airport or the buyer’s warehouse, in the case of exports, and vice versa for imports. It also reports on customs release times, whether or not the shipments in question are subject to physical inspections, and the proportion of shipments that this applies to.

These indicators are a valuable initial attempt to measure these factors and are undoubtedly useful as an initial practical approximation as they cover a broad range of countries and allow time at the border to be monitored over the years.

However, these indicators have their limitations

These are mainly to do with coverage and the assumptions that underlie these surveys, which affect their precision. Another shortcoming is that these measurements do not contemplate the significant disparities in time to trade within each country. This is important as time at the border can vary greatly, which may have a significant effect on firms’ trade outcomes.[1]

The World Bank’s Enterprise Surveys constitute an initial approach to this heterogeneity on the export side, as they include a firm-specific measure of time at the border for the customs stage. This data reports the average number of days between goods from a certain establishment reaching their exit point and these goods being released by customs.

Transactional customs data is a significant advance in measurement terms

In several countries in the world, customs and other border organizations systematically gather highly detailed, transaction-specific, real-time information on the start and finish times for border procedures. This allows time at the border to be described exhaustively and precisely for the entire universe of shipments that enter or leave an economy, rather than a mere sample of these. When big data from customs information systems is used to compare distributions of the number of days taken to release exports from customs with the corresponding data from the World Bank Export Surveys, the latter tend to underrepresent shorter dispatch times and overrepresent longer ones. Consequently, they systematically overestimate customs processing times (figure 1).

The devil is in the details

Customs declarations and electronic cargo manifests report the arrival date of the shipment, the date that it was unloaded, the date that the customs import declaration was created and recorded, the customs processing channel, the date of physical inspection, where relevant, and the date that the shipment was released from customs.

An analysis of this data for Peru reveals four stylized facts.

Fact 1: Total time at the border includes port and customs processing times, and storage time and preparation between each of these stages (and after them).

Fact 2: Entry times are highly skewed toward fast clearance times but there is a long tail of slow clearances. Nearly 50% of shipments complete the process within 12 days or less but may take more than 30 days to do so at the higher end of the distribution. Median total time at the border is 12 days (figure 2).

Fact 3: Entry times vary by country of origin, products, and exporting, and especially importing firms.

Fact 4: Firms absorb long unloading times with shorter storage and preparation times. In other words, firms’ buffer times are a response to the times that ports take to handle shipments. Specifically, firms cut down on preparation and storage time by 1.5% for each 10% increase in the time it takes for port operations to be completed. According to data for 2013, the median time that goods spend at the port is 48 hours and the median storage and preparation time is 168 hours, so firms reduce the latter by two and a half hours for each five-hour increase to the former. Although real port and customs processing times are uncertain and extending shipment deadlines is costly, firms balance out the cost of that additional time and the cost of a late delivery when they decide what time margin to assign to the stage in the supply chain that takes place at the border.

The above evidence has two clear implications for measuring time at the border

First, the times at the border that are relevant to policy-making can be measured more precisely if the real processing times associated with port and customs handling are used. The total time that shipments spend at the border may differ from this figure because firms include a margin of time to avoid late deliveries. Combining processing-related measures with measures that depend on firm behavior may thus give rise to country rankings that are not entirely consistent if they are assumed to reflect the efficiency of ports or customs services.

Second, access to information on the distributions of times at the border is essential to understanding critical heterogeneities within countries, as these times vary by product, origin, and importer. If this information is not considered, country-level measures may be influenced by the set of goods that a given country trades, its trade partners, and the specific characteristics of its firms. Therefore, variations in these measures between countries may not necessarily reflect differences in the efficiency of their respective port and customs organizations.

This measurement affects estimates of the effects of border times and evaluations of the impact of trade facilitation policies

If these are measured using port and customs processing time, times at the border have a significant negative impact on imports. Specifically, it is estimated that a 10% increase in time at the border reduces imports by 2.4%. However, this effect would be 5.7% if it were based on total time at the border (figure 3). This shows that measures of total time to trade that include shares that can be attributed to firms’ optimizing behavior may lead to biased estimates of the cost of times at the border.

Borders

To summarize, the transactional data on the processing of trade flows that is gathered by border agencies allow times at the border to be measured and reported for a broad set of countries. These could then be ranked and monitored over time by applying measurement criteria such as those used in the World Customs Organization (WCO) time release study, including rules for calculating summary measures that reflect the distributions of these times. When evaluating investments in trade facilitation, the focus needs to be on the share of time at the border that is connected to the necessary processing of shipments, which can then be used in estimates of the costs that these times represent.

 


[1] For example, the standardized case study on which the DB’s data collection process is based starts with the premise that each economy imports a shipment of 15 metric tons of auto-parts in a container from its main import partner and exports its main export product to its main export partner via the most widely used form of transportation. According to trade data for the last five years, the benchmark imports and exports for measuring time at the border in Uruguay are exports of meat and meat offal to the Russian Federation through the port of Montevideo and imports of motor vehicle parts and accessories from Brazil through the Río Branco border crossing. The former account for 2% of total export values and 1.5% of the total number of exporting firms, while the latter only represent 0.1% of total import values and 0.2% of importing firms. Consequently, the corresponding time indicators could hardly be considered representative of Uruguay’s foreign trade.

 


Filed Under: Trade Facilitation

Christian Volpe Martincus

Christian Volpe Martincus is Principal Economist at the Integration and Trade Sector of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Christian has expertise in international trade, foreign direct investment, regional integration, and economic geography, and has advised several governments in both Latin America and the Caribbean and OECD countries on these matters. He previously worked for the Ministry of the Economy of the Province of Buenos Aires and was advisor at the MERCOSUR Commission of the National Representatives Chamber in Argentina. In addition, he was researcher at the Center for European Integration Studies in Bonn, Germany. At the IDB Christian has been working on the impacts of trade and investment facilitation and promotion policies, the effects of trade and multinational production on sustainability, the implications of digital technologies for trade and investment, the role of integration in shaping trade flows and specialization patterns, and the interplay between innovation and exports (https://www.christianvolpe.com/). His research has been published in various professional journals such as the Review of Economics and Statistics, the Journal of International Economics, and the Journal of Development Economics, among others. Christian has a PhD in Economics from the University of Bonn, and is CESifo Research Fellow, Associate Editor of the Review of International Economics, and member of the Editorial Board of the World Trade Review.

Jerónimo Carballo

Jerónimo Carballo is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Colorado Boulder. His primary research interest is International Trade with a special emphasis on firms' decisions under uncertainty and how firms organize trade across countries. He is also interested in the relationships between buyers and sellers in different countries and exploring trade costs using micro data. His research has been published in the Journal of International Economics, the Journal of Development Economics, and other outlets.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jordan Blake says

    May 2, 2018 at 2:39 pm

    Making border crossing more efficient and less costly should be an item in any countries agenda but I wouldn’t sacrifice security for faster transactions.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Productivity and Trade

This space explores how trade, investment and sustainable development in strategic sectors can boost productivity and strengthen more dynamic, inclusive and resilient economies in Latin America and the Caribbean. From trade facilitation and export and investment promotion to entrepreneurship, the development of public-private synergies, agri-food systems and tourism, we address challenges and opportunities for growth in the region.

Related posts

  • Miles of Red Tape and Piles of Paperwork: How We Can Simplify Labyrinthine Borders and Bring Countries Closer to International Markets?
  • The Border Traffic Light: How Customs Processing Affects Trade
  • The Authorized Economic Operator Program: Firm Steps toward Exporting to More and More Markets
  • How Does Trade Respond When Borders Are Simplified via Single-Window Systems?
  • Latin America struggles with trade logistics. Here’s what we can do.

Categories

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

    Blog posts written by Bank employees:

    Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


    For blogs written by external parties:

    For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

    The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

    Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



    Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

    Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

    Aviso Legal

    Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

    facebook
    twitter
    youtube
    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
    To learn more about cookies, click here
    X
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT