Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Ideas Matter

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Macroeconomics and Finance
    • Microeconomics and Competitiveness
    • Politics and Institutions
    • Social Issues
  • Authors
  • Spanish
Global trade Latin America

The Psychology of Support for Trade

October 11, 2019 by Ernesto Stein - Razvan Vlaicu Leave a Comment


Is free trade beneficial to Latin America and the Caribbean? Most economists believe it is. Free trade allows countries to specialize in what they do best, developing competitive advantages and leading to greater consumer choice and lower prices.

Most citizens seem to agree. An IDB-commissioned poll, included in the cross-regional Latinobarómetro survey, finds popular support for international trade to be strong, with 73% of citizens in 2018 in favor of increasing it.

This support, however, is fragile. It can be “a mile wide, but an inch deep,” in the words of Princeton economist Alan Blinder. Citizens may favor more trade. But if politicians warn of job losses from lowering trade barriers and if media and social media hype those arguments, backing for trade can dwindle. What can make the difference is how arguments in favor and against free trade are cast.

Guarding against the negative framing of free trade

This means that policymakers who believe in trade have to be aware of how it is being portrayed, how its benefits and losses are framed. This issue is probed in an advance chapter of the IDB’s 2019 flagship publication, Trading Promises for Results, which will be released soon. Trade faces numerous challenges, the publication stresses, including those brought on by geopolitical and technological changes. Safeguarding popular support for free trade in this context may depend on preventing it from being portrayed in a negative light.

Here some concepts from psychology and behavioral economics about framing arguments come in handy. Consider loss aversion, the idea that people are affected more by the fear of loss than the enjoyment of gains. Or the closely related idea of negativity bias that claims that people react more strongly to unexpected negative news than to unexpected positive news. We have an instinct for self-preservation, psychology tells us, and negative surprises and the fear of loss are very potent.

The psychological impacts of messages on trade

An experiment conducted for the new IDB flagship publication shows just how powerful these forces are when it comes to trade. The researchers randomly assigned Latinobarómetro poll respondents to four different groups: a control group, a positive framing group, a negative framing group, and a mixed framing group.  Each was asked if it supported trade given the possibility of specific benefits or losses.

The positive framing group was told trade would reduce prices and increase product choice. How did they react to this positive message? Amazingly, it had virtually no impact. Two arguments can explain why. First, the statement was not surprising: most respondents were already inclined to believe that trade provided consumption benefits. Interestingly, many respondents also associated low prices and foreign goods with low wages.

Effects of Framing on Support for Trade in Latin America

Concerns about employment also turned up strongly in the other treatment groups. The negative framing group, informed that trade could lead to job losses in import-competing sectors, displayed a powerful reaction. Support for trade in that group dropped more than 26 percentage points from around 73% to only around 46%. Loss aversion — the fear of losing employment — almost certainly played a role. So did negativity bias, as people who had had a positive image of trade as a net job creator now received a negative shock to their beliefs. The negative framing group, in short, got a double blow — a feeling of both loss and negativity — that turned overwhelming backing for trade into minority support.

This was somewhat mitigated in the mixed framing group, which was told that trade could generate both the positive benefits of falling prices and greater product choice and the drawbacks of job losses. Among this group, support for trade dropped around 17 percentage points, with the positive information not enough to offset the negative, but still reducing its effect by more than a third.

There were also some interesting variations among countries. In Costa Rica, for example, the negative arguments against trade caused reductions in support of only 9 percentage points, compared to the regional average of 26 percentage points. This is likely because the country had a referendum on the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) in 2007 and its citizens were already well-versed in the arguments for and against trade. They had firmer beliefs and preferences about it and were thus potentially less affected by the negative framing emphasizing job losses.

Using loss aversion to bolster support for trade

Still the negative arguments had their impact, indicating how important it is to guard against trade opponents who marshal negative information about jobs — the most important consideration for people in the region — to derail efforts to liberalize the region’s economies. Policymakers who believe in trade may have to counterpunch with information about the potential employment gains. Or, as indicated by loss aversion, they may want to emphasize employment losses in export sectors that could result from protectionist measures.

Publication on Trade in Latin America


Filed Under: Macroeconomics and Finance Tagged With: #Latinobarómetro, #Trade, #TradePolicy

Ernesto Stein

Ernesto Stein is the IDB Representative in Mexico. Previously he was a Principal Economist at the IDB’s Research Department, the IDB’s Regional Economic Advisor in the Country Department of Belize, Central America, Mexico, Panama and the Dominican Republic, and a Growth Fellow at Harvard University’s Center for International Development. He has published extensively on issues of international trade and integration, foreign direct investment, productive development policies, institutional economics and political economy. A native of Argentina, he holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of California at Berkeley.

Razvan Vlaicu

Razvan Vlaicu is a senior economist in the Research Department at the Inter-American Development Bank. His research interests are in public economics and political economics, with a focus on the role of governance and institutions in economic development. He received his Ph.D. in Economics from Northwestern University, taught economics at the University of Maryland, and held short-term positions at the Kellogg School of Management and the World Bank. His research has been published in journals such as the Review of Economic Studies, American Political Science Review, Journal of International Economics, and Journal of Public Economics.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Related posts

  • Trade: Winners and Losers in the North and South
  • The New Free-Market Fervor in Latin America
  • The Importance of Good Regulations: When Investing Well Is Not Enough
  • The Pros and Cons of Simplified Tax Notices and Amnesties
  • Ensuring that the Gains from Trade are Inclusive and Sustainable

About this blog

The blog of the IDB's Research Department shares ideas that matter on public policy and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
To learn more about cookies, click here
X
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT