Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Ideas Matter

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Macroeconomics and Finance
    • Microeconomics and Competitiveness
    • Politics and Institutions
    • Social Issues
  • Authors
  • Spanish

Foreign Aid for Disasters: Never Enough

April 30, 2015 by Eduardo Cavallo Leave a Comment


AIDThe destruction was colossal, the after-shocks harrowing. Nepal’s April 25th earthquake, measuring 7.8 on the Richter scale, leveled large parts of the country, reduced ancient city centers and mud-brick villages to rubble, and left much of the nation in chaos. More than 5,000 people died, more than 10,000 were injured, and  tens of thousands lost their homes. Nations from around the world rushed in search-and-rescue and medical response teams. The United States released $10 million in emergency funds; the UN, $15 million. But as survivors poured into relief encampments or huddled under plastic sheeting by the roadsides, there were reasons to question the aid response. Would it reach remote villages? Would it be enough?  And would it allow the nation to rebuild towards a sustainable recovery?

History is not encouraging. Between January 1970 and June 2008, there were 6,530 extreme events around the world, including floods, storms and earthquakes,  according to the data base  at  Belgium’s Catholic University of Louvain. If the international response to those catastrophes was often unpredictable and inconsistent,  it also tended to be meager, especially compared to the level of destruction. A review of 98 cases found that median aid flows to nations the year of a disaster increased 18% compared to the previous two years.  That amounted to a mere 0.25% of GDP and less than 3% of total estimated damages. Moreover, some of that assistance was not  new. It was simply reallocated by the donors from other sectors like infrastructure.

Many research papers in the past have focused on how U.S. aid generally (though not disaster aid specifically) favors nations where the United States has geo-strategic or political interests. In fact, there is little evidence to suggest that post-disaster giving by the US or other donor nations reflects such considerations. Nor is disaster relief offered  more to wealthy countries. Nations with large GDPs and large stocks of foreign reserves are less likely to receive help. But aid can be extremely limited. Donors do not significantly increase their official development assistance or reassign it from normal recipients to disaster-afflicted ones in the wake of a calamity. They do not rally their resources. And if countries expect large surges in giving after an earthquake, flood or storm, they are very often disappointed.

Equally problematic are the dramatic differences between aid commitments and    disbursement. The January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, for example, killed more than 220,000 and moved governments and multilateral organizations at a New York donor’s conference to pledge unprecedented amounts in relief. Haiti, the donors said, would “turn a corner” and “build back better” despite the immense loss of life.  But at the end of 2012, according to the office of the UN Special Envoy to Haiti, only 62% of the aid promised at the conference had been disbursed. Moreover, the nation had yet to recover.  Earthquake debris remained in the streets. Thousands of people continued to eke out an existence in tent cities, and the lingering effects of a cholera epidemic introduced into Haiti by UN forces were still being felt.

Gauging the efficacy of foreign assistance after a disaster is a tricky endeavor.  There is little documentation, for example, on whether it reaches the intended recipients and whether it supports the most promising projects. Uncertainties also exist about how to distribute it.  Should it be quickly handed over for rebuilding? Or should it be sequenced over time to avoid inflation? Should it rebuild what existed before? Or should it focus on technological innovations that reduce vulnerabilities and create more resilient communities? All these areas are ripe for research.

In the meantime, countries would be wise not to bank on the international community to rescue it after nature has struck.  The aid that does arrive is generally insufficient. It cannot substitute for the accumulated savings that can be spent on reconstruction when the world is upended. Nor can it replace disaster-reduction measures, like early warning systems and retrofitted infrastructure; effective insurance,  and carefully considered disaster management plans.

As the Nepalese pick through the piles of brick and wood that remain of their homes and try to imagine rebuilding the magnificent Buddhist and Hindu monuments and plazas that toppled in the earthquake and its aftershocks, they will look for the international community for respite.  Inevitably, however, they will be faced with a sober reality. International aid will arrive, and it may very well help.   But it will almost surely not be enough.

For more information: Foreign Aid in the Aftermath of Large Natural Disasters 

By: @eduardocavallo


Filed Under: Politics and Institutions, Social Issues Tagged With: #earthquakes, #internationalaid, #Nepal

Eduardo Cavallo

Eduardo Cavallo is Principal Economist at the Research Department of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) in Washington DC. Prior to joining the IDB, Eduardo was a Vice-President and Senior Latin American Economist for Goldman Sachs in New York. Eduardo had already worked at the IDB as a Research Economist between 2006 and 2010. Before that he served as a research fellow at the Center for International Development (CID), a visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, and a member of the faculty at the Kennedy School of Government's Summer Program. In Argentina he co-founded Fundación Grupo Innova. Eduardo’s research interests are in the fields of international finance and macroeconomics with a focus on Latin America. He has published in several academic journals, and is the co-editor of the books “Building Opportunities for Growth in a Challenging World” (IDB, 2019); “A Mandate to Grow” (IDB, 2018); “Saving for Development: how Latin America and the Caribbean can save more and better” (Palgrave, 2016) and “Dealing with an International Credit Crunch: Policy Responses to Sudden Stops in Latin America” (IDB, 2009). He holds a Ph.D. in Public Policy and an MPP from Harvard University, and a B.A. in Economics from Universidad de San Andres (UdeSA) in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Related posts

  • Bracing for Impact: Preparing Nations for Natural Disasters
  • Fuerza Chile
  • Natural Disasters: How Nations Build Resilience
  • Natural Disaster Insurance: Why Don’t More Countries Have It?
  • Quake’n and Shake’n…Forever!

About this blog

The blog of the IDB's Research Department shares ideas that matter on public policy and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

    Blog posts written by Bank employees:

    Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


    For blogs written by external parties:

    For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

    The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

    Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



    Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

    Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

    Aviso Legal

    Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

    facebook
    twitter
    youtube
    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
    To learn more about cookies, click here
    X
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT