05 noviembre 2015

Bridging gender gaps? That is not the case with female labor force participation

Watch the recording of the launch event here

By Leonardo Gasparini and Mariana Marchionni*

The strong increase in female labor force participation is among the most salient socioeconomic changes in Latin America in the last half-century. Not only because it implies a profound transformation in the daily life of millions of Latin American women and families, but also because of its impact on economy and social aspects as poverty, inequality, unemployment or education.

Despite these benefits, the long-run pattern of gains for women has been insufficient to close the gap with men in most labor market outcomes, such as wages, employment and labor force participation.

In fact, the results of our study highlight a change in this trend that makes the situation potentially more worrisome: there are signs of a widespread and significant deceleration in the entry of women into the Latin American labor markets that seems to have been taking place since the early/mid-2000s. This deceleration applies to all women, but particularly to the more vulnerable groups: women with low education, living in rural areas, with children, or married to low-earnings spouses.

This phenomenon has delayed the closing of the gender gap, and makes improbable the fulfillment of the gender-equity Millennium Development Goals related to female employment. Moreover, this trend may also compromise poverty reduction targets.

Although the evidence we discuss in the book is never conclusive and admits alternative explanations, our preferred interpretation is that the fast economic growth experienced by the region in the 2000s was an important determinant of this deceleration: with more jobs, greater social protection benefits, and with their partners earning higher wages, more and more women chose to stay home.

But if the cause of this trend is shared prosperity, why would it be bad news? In fact, this may have some positive implications, such as a potential for better job matching, and more time for higher quality parental childcare.

However, the problem is that being out of the labor market for some time may imply loss of productivity, and it may also reinforce traditional gender roles within the household. These factors may cause a reduction in the attachment to the labor force for women and, ultimately, reduce possibilities for autonomous income generation in the longer term. This may in turn hinder the process of poverty reduction in the region, in which women’s work played a crucial role in the last decades.

What can labor policies do?

The recent slowdown in female labor force participation is likely to place active labor policies at the center of the policy debate. In the book we discuss a large set of policy interventions that may help foster female employment, and that can be classified according to three main objectives: relaxing the constraints on women’s time, improving women’s agency, and attaining fair labor markets. Examples of the main initiatives are:

  • The expansion of childcare centers and pre-primary education, and the promotion of schools with extended hours and care services for the elderly.
  • The system of parental leave should be extended and updated: paternity leave that cannot be transferred to women, parental leave for childcare, more flexible schedules and collective financing.
  • More information and resources for family planning, easing the access to contraceptive methods and removing incentives for increased fertility.
  • Advocacy on co-responsibility at home may empower women and facilitate their insertion into the labor markets.
  • Advance toward gender equality in terms of property rights, for instance, by improving the security of cohabiting, widowed and divorced women’s rights.
  • Governments should pay attention to the unintended effects of social programs on gender issues, and try to alleviate their potential side effects.
  • More flexible work arrangements could be useful for the dual objectives of caring for children and older adults at home, and let women pursue a professional career. However, it has some drawbacks (e.g. reinforcing traditional gender roles within the family) and calls for a case-by-case evaluation.
  • Extending education to disadvantaged groups of the population, including vulnerable women, remains a central policy for labor force participation.

Some of these initiatives are already in place in Latin America, but others are still missing in the region.

FotorCreated* Leonardo Gasparini and Mariana Marchionni are the coauthors of the book “Bridging gender gaps? The rise and deceleration of female labor force participation in Latin America”, written in CEDLAS-Universidad Nacional de La Plata (Argentina), as part of the project “Enhancing Women’s Economic Empowerment Through Better Policies in Latin America,” a joint initiative with CIEDUR, that was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre in Ottawa (Canada).

The views expressed in the book or in this post do not necessarily represent those of IDRC or its Board of Governors.

1 Response

  1. Pingback : Testing Ourselves: Do We Have Unconscious Bias about Gender and Work? - Democratsnewz

Leave a Reply