Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Sostenibilidad

Just another web-blogs Sites site

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Agriculture and Food Security
    • Climate change
    • Ecosystems and Biodiversity
    • Environmental and Social Safeguards
    • Infrastructure and Sustainable Landscapes
    • Institutionality
    • Responsible Production and Consumption
  • Authors
  • English
    • Español

An essential script for environmental and social impact assessments

May 31, 2017 por David Baringo 4 Comments


When I was young I wanted to be a movie scriptwriter. I ended up being just a sociologist, but I still remember something I read back then about how a good script sequence should look like. For example, in the classic “boy meets girl” plot, first the central characters are presented, then they meet; then something happens to them –they may fight and later reconcile, or whatever– and after that comes the (usually happy) ending. My brief and hapless movie career did leave me a valuable lesson that I still find useful: the importance of following a cogent order on environmental and social projects, with quality and participative diagnostics, eventual impacts adequately pondered, and mitigation steps that include clear, realistic and well-funded proposals that are suitable for the main stakeholders.

Directive B.5 of the Environment and Safeguards Compliance Policy (OP-703) is stark clear—all high-risk operations (Category A and B) must have an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), depending on the nature and importance of their potential impacts. It also says that their preparation and implementation are the responsibility of the borrower, although we at the Inter-American Development Bank’s Environmental and Social Safeguards Unit usually are ready (and more than happy) to help in order to ensure their observance.

We at the IDB have long insisted on the importance of taking an integral approach to the implementation of safeguards, adopting a view capable of coordinating the environmental and social aspects of each operation.

A recurrent subject in Latin American and Caribbean countries is that, in general terms, their legislation and professional practice in the area of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are quite consolidated. Although with ups and downs and diverse levels of efficiency among countries, experts tend to agree that the past few decades saw progress in these areas in the region. However, it can be said that in terms of implementation of Social Impact Assessments (SIAs) we are still in the initial stages. While there are a few exceptions, in general legislation, methodologies and professional practice in these fields continue to be limited. Given the scarcity of literature in Spanish to help adopt best international practices, the document “Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing  the Social Impacts of Projects,” prepared by Professor Frank Vanclay and published by the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), was recently translated into Spanish with support from the IDB.

Additionally, Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs) in Latin America and the Caribbean have often focused mostly on the environmental aspects. It is quite common that, although on the first page of evaluations the word “Social” is present, in the body of the study we find only a few vague references to social aspects in the baseline that typically end up dissolving into some general recommendations in the ESMP. In other words, although the terms “and social” may be added to the title of documents, many of these key planning and management tools continue to focus almost exclusively on the (undeniably important) environmental aspects of projects.

In order to strengthen the social aspects of the ESIAs with a socio-environmental approach, we at the IDB have been working together with AySA, Argentina’s water and sanitation public operator in the Buenos Aires metropolitan area, on the Water and Sanitation Program for the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area and Conurbation. The pilot experience consisted of the IDB hiring a social consultant that for a while worked alongside the social team of AySA’s Environmental Directorate. Together, they worked on areas such as:

  • Strengthening the ESIAs social baseline content, adding social aspects to preexisting environmental considerations (dust, noise, etc.)
  • Taking specific mitigation and monitoring steps on projects’ socio-environmental issues

In addition, other aspects have also been strengthened, such as claims-and-complaints handling procedures, or key consultations made during the planning, construction, and operation stages of a program.

Going back to what I said about a script’s structure, Environmental and Social Assessments should learn to better merge their socio-environmental aspects following a logical sequence. Also, impact assessment documents must be consistent with their baselines, their socio-environmental impact matrices, and the analysis of the participation activities that were conducted. All these factors may make it more likely that our project reaches a “happy ending.”


Filed Under: Environmental and Social Safeguards

David Baringo

David Baringo es Doctor en Sociología y postgrados en Planificación Territorial y Ambiental y en Investigación Social Aplicada. Es Especialista Social en la Unidad de Salvaguardias Ambientales y Sociales del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Antes de unirse al BID, fue primero profesor e investigador en la Facultad de Trabajo Social de la Universidad de Zaragoza y, a continuación, fue Especialista Social Senior para la firma IDOM donde trabajó para múltiples proyectos de ingeniería y consultoría financiados por el Banco Mundial, Banco Asiático de Desarrollo, Banco Centroamericano de Integración Económica, la Comisión Europea o el propio BID.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Eric Gagnon says

    June 2, 2017 at 12:23 pm

    Hi David,
    You wrote “Environmental and Social Assessments should learn to better merge their socio-environmental aspects following a logical sequence”. I agree with this. But what exactly is so new about it? Could you expand a bit more the logical sequence itself, or direct us to 1-2 relevant documents in the IDB Database?
    Thank you in advance!

    Reply
    • Autor invitadoDavid Baringo says

      June 7, 2017 at 3:36 pm

      Thanks Eric, for your comment. Basically the logical sequence is based on IAIA’s SIA Guidance . A common problem in LAC region is that the “environmental” elements of the assessments use to be much stronger that the “social” ones. There are not many good practices of ESIAs that properly merge both components putting into practice an integrated socio-environmental approach. To address this challenge, it is important to support local implementing agencies in order to integrate into their teams more social specialists, and that they work more closely with their environmental colleagues.

      Reply
  2. Dragica says

    June 5, 2017 at 9:36 am

    Great article David. Thanks for sharing. I think that environmental and social experts/teams should work together but still, each of them should do what they do the best – Environmentalist should do EIA and a sociologist/social scientist – SIA. So often I see 2 in 1 or 3 in 1 scheme, where the Client wants 1 expert with a few diverse skills. So often I see ESMP with extensive environmental part and just a few references to social part of the project. Or, it is just called EMP (for a social safeguard category A projects) with a few paragraphs related to resettlement and other social issues. Do you think that a Sociologist can do an excellent work in preparing an EMP or an Environmental expert can prepare a great SIA? Maybe some can do, but majority would be the best performers in their own professional fields. At least, my experience leads me toward such conclusions.

    Reply
    • Autor invitadoDavid Baringo says

      June 7, 2017 at 3:39 pm

      Thanks, Dragica, I think that you are hitting the nail on the head with your comment. I consider that ESIAs work better when are done by a multidisciplinary team, sharing different analytical perspectives and knowledge backgrounds, understanding each other roles, and working as a team. It’s generally not a good idea to play as a one-man or one-woman band, mainly because many times the environmental and the social elements of development projects are complex and blended. For example, to conduct meaningful consultations in a watershed management project, you need to provide reliable water quality data to the stakeholders. At the same time, if you only focus on technical data and you do not pay much attention to the stakeholder’s points of view, your project is more likely to fail. To improve the performance and the outcomes of the ESIAs, environmentalists and social scientists should learn to work together as a team.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

SEARCH

Sustainability

This blog is a space to reflect about the challenges, opportunities and the progress made by Latin American and Caribbean countries on the path towards the region’s sustainable development.

SIMILAR POSTS

  • Using training to improve projects’ social and environmental impact management
  • 4 facts about IDB’s standard on assessment and management of environmental and social risks and impacts
  • Five Challenges Posed by the Social Component of Environmental Impact Assessments
  • Is “sustainable infrastructure” yet another buzzword? Not if you work in impact assessment!
  • Enroll now! A new learning platform for managing environmental and social risk

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Derechos de autor © 2023 · Magazine Pro en Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
To learn more about cookies, click here
x
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT