Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Ideas Matter

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Macroeconomics and Finance
    • Microeconomics and Competitiveness
    • Politics and Institutions
    • Social Issues
  • Authors
  • Spanish

From Empowerment to Inequality: The Tradeoffs of Community-Based Targeting

July 31, 2024 by Diego Vera-Cossio Leave a Comment


Local leaders know a lot about the people in their communities, including their level of wealth and need. That can often allow them to distribute resources, like anti-poverty funds, more effectively than far away bureaucracies.

But where community members must decide on the basis of multiple, difficult-to-verify criteria, things get murky. How should loans, for example, be granted? To those with good credit history; those with the most productive projects, or those recovering from a bout of hardship? Asking local leaders to offer loans on the basis of potentially subjective criteria is not only complex. It can open up more of a role for local connections and favoritism to the detriment of community welfare.

In an IDB study published in the Journal of the European Economic Association, I sought to examine how efficient the locally-based allocation of subsidized credit was in Thailand’s Million Baht program, one of the world’s largest microfinance programs. The program, which began in 2001, provided one million baht (about US$24,000 at 2001 prices) to every Thai village for loans that would be managed and distributed by a village committee made up of elected community members.

Personal Connections Matter

Village committees could award loans to the neediest households, the most creditworthy, or those with the most productive enterprises. But they did none of these things. In practice, they disproportionately allocated them to households connected to the committees. Using detailed data from the Townsend Thai project, which surveys households in Thai villages on a monthly basis, I found that households with good credit history or productive businesses were not favored and that poorer households were less likely to receive loans.

It was the well-connected that had the advantage. Households with economic ties to the political elite (members of the village government) were 20 percentage points more likely to receive loans from the program, even after accounting for differences in productivity, debt default, history, and poverty. To confirm that this pattern was related to favoritism, I compared the loan terms (amount and interest rates) that the program awarded to well-connected households to the terms that the same households got from other lenders. Compared to what they faced with other lenders, the well-connected got larger and cheaper loans from the village program. Households without key connections, meanwhile, borrowed on similar terms with every lender.

The Role of Informal Markets

Informal markets did have a mitigating effect, if only a partial one. Cross-household lending rose as a result of the program, with well-connected households serving as lenders and, unconnected households also increased their borrowing, often from relatives, by 30%. Still these loans from informal village networks were obtained at an average annual interest rate of 14%, twice the rate offered by the program.

Favoritism in the end led to productive and social inefficiencies, in terms of both growth and fairness. A counterfactual analysis for the study reveals that eliminating the connection-based advantage would have increased local GDP by 2% and reduced inequality by 9%, revealing real costs to a system where personal ties hold sway.

Balancing Community-Based Targeting Against a More Centralized Approach

The question remains what can be done. Community-driven approaches in the best of circumstances can leverage local knowledge to target those most in need. But allowing community leaders to make decisions about who benefits from social programs can also introduce biases and favoritism, as they skew selections to those who benefit them and their networks. And that is particularly true, as when awarding loans, they must balance multiple criteria.

More centralized and simple targeting rules, like relying on proxy-means tests or credit scores, could eliminate special treatment for the well-connected. But they are not a panacea. They be could be too rigid, causing needy and deserving people to be left out. And because households with better credit history also tend to be wealthier, they might also increase inequality, as the study found. In this trade-off, it is not at all clear that abandoning the community-based approach for screening borrowers is the right way to go. But it could be substantially improved. Better program design that allowed non-elite households to directly participate in the monitoring process or verify that they are getting their fair share of government support could, for example, make a big difference. And because participation in community-based organizations tends to be greater among more privileged households, policy efforts to integrate poorer households into such organizations could also help ensure fairer and inclusive implementation of social programs without sacrificing financial responsibility.


Filed Under: Microeconomics and Competitiveness Tagged With: #inequality

Diego Vera-Cossio

Diego Vera-Cossio is an economist in the Research Department of the Inter-American Development Bank. His area of interest is development economics. In particular, his research analyzes how different policies help or prevent family businesses from growing in contexts in which access to finance is limited. He is also interested in understanding how different methods of targeting and delivering resources from public programs affect policy effectiveness. Diego, a citizen of Bolivia, received his Ph.D. in Economics from the University of California, San Diego in 2018. He holds a Master’s Degree in Economics from Universidad de Chile and a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from Universidad Católica Boliviana.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Related posts

  • Can Digital Payments Boost the Impact of Social Programs?
  • Turning a Piggy Bank into a Savings Account in Peru
  • Can Cash Transfers to Non-Poor Households Prevent Poverty?
  • Cash Transfer Programs: Challenging the Welfare Myth
  • Five Lessons on Strengthening Social Protection from Three Years of Research at the IDB’s Research Department

About this blog

The blog of the IDB's Research Department shares ideas that matter on public policy and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

    Blog posts written by Bank employees:

    Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


    For blogs written by external parties:

    For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

    The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

    Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



    Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

    Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

    Aviso Legal

    Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

    facebook
    twitter
    youtube
    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
    To learn more about cookies, click here
    X
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT