Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Gestión fiscal

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Decentralization
    • Public Spending
    • Taxes
  • authors
  • Publications
  • English
    • Español
Agencia de datos en las administraciones tributarias

The Future of Tax Administrations Lies in the Intelligence Generated by Big Data

July 25, 2024 by Raul Zambrano - Santiago Díaz De Sarralde - Alberto Barreix - Martin Bès Leave a Comment


Digital transformation, professionalization of the public administration, and greater international tax cooperation are driving the creation of a second mission within tax administrations beyond traditional tax control: the data agency.

This new stage of institutional evolution of the TA is the topic we address in the study Quo vadis, administración tributaria?, which we published in collaboration with the Inter-American Center of Tax Administrations (CIAT). In this blog, we will discuss some of the main conclusions.

Data Agency Transformation Factors

There are three key factors that are driving this transformation. Firstly, greater budgetary and management autonomy, which promoted professionalization of human resources and improvement of infrastructure, as well as technical independence of the organization.

Secondly, information technology and telecommunication have been massively incorporated and developed, facilitating not only compliance and control of obligations, but also the incorporation of non-tax services, such as e-invoices. The latter has made it possible to process large amounts of data on economic transactions, which can now be used to provide more transparency about the prices of goods and services, and even a more precise measurement of economic activity.

Finally, in compliance with the international transparency commitments (of the Global Forum), there has been progress in lifting bank secrecy, allowing the exchange of information and knowledge of the ultimate beneficiary owners of property, achieving broad access to financial accounts and asset data of taxpayers at a global scale. This allows TAs to also be key agents in the fight against fraud and money laundering.

This enormous accumulation of information on taxpayers is bringing administrations closer to data centers and economic intelligence, expanding the business lines developed over decades and, therefore, generating changes in the institutional arrangements to fulfill these functions (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Stages of Tax Administration, Key Components, and Milestones

 Source: Barreix and Zambrano (2018)

The Potential of a Data Agency within the Tax Administration

The creation of a data agency will allow tax administrations to deepen tax control.

New data science tools and important computational advances make it possible to exploit available big data and, therefore, transform auditing based on risk and make draft returns a reality. Furthermore, the digitalization of traditional functions (registration, recovery, inspection, etc.) will significantly improve tax control.

On the other hand, voluntary compliance should be strongly promoted, taking advantage of prior availability of information on taxpayers’ operations. This prior availability makes it possible to apply a prospective approach, based on predictive analysis of taxpayer behavior, complementary to the traditional “forensic” review control based on audits of earlier periods.

Digital Service Provider

The data agency will also allow the tax administration to position itself as a provider of digital services in its economic activity and to the taxpayer themself. Some examples of these new functions are, among others:

  • Promoting equity through fiscal policy. In Ecuador, for instance, e-invoice data is used to provide VAT refunds to poor or disabled taxpayers.
  • Expanding credit to smaller companies by “factoring” through sales to third parties of their validated e-invoices, as occurs in Chile.
  • Boosting market transparency. The use of information on the prices of products and services in e-invoices helps find the lowest price of mass consumption goods for consumers, as occurs in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, with the Menor Preço mobile app.

Additionally, tax administrations will be able to support the government in key areas such as:

  •  Advance economic monitoring for making micro and macroeconomic forecasts, as the transactions of the economy are known in real time, based on economic sector, geographical area, and type of taxpayer.
  • Regulation and defense of competition through e-invoices that can facilitate the identification of abuses of market power by monopolists with economic income, or price collusion by oligopolists that improve efficiency and equity in the market.

Institutional Adjustments of Recovery and Data Management Strategies

The effectiveness of the tax administration as a data agency depends on digital transformation and the transit of information from the following stakeholders:

  1. Public institutions providing information (cadastres, registries, regulatory agencies, other levels of government, etc.).
  2. Other recipients of their action (ministries, judiciary branch, police, national security agencies, etc.) and,
  3. Exchange of information with other jurisdictions.

To be successful in this task, tax administrations must make institutional arrangements to ensure that, on the one hand, quality data is gathered and processed from revenue entities in the public sector and, on the other, these institutions can offer services to streamline private-sector operations.

In terms of data from revenue entities, it is recommended to concentrate its management in a single organization, as this would help ensure that the data is gathered massively, systematically, and completely, taking advantage of synergies in processes and systems. This, added to the regulatory restriction of respecting tax secrecy, prescribes the application of a central node information distribution and security model (see Figure 2).

Figure 2. Internal and External Sources of the Tax Administration in the Future, and Network Prototypes to Structure Tax Information

These two arguments would make it possible to safely merge TA data with Customs and contribution revenues, and even assimilate (piggyback) them to subnational Tas, i.e., concentrating data and control in an expanded TA.

However, this tendency to centralize data management should consider operational exceptions for subnational tax administrations, given the local nature of some taxes (property taxes, vehicle taxes, fees etc.) and customs, which must efficiently manage international trade facilitation in the international movement of goods and people. Customs, in general, do not work with predefined elements and cycles, as is the case in the management of internal taxes (preset taxes, deadlines, and processes).

Coordination of unified data management between Customs and the TA should occur in the Customs/internal tax cycle. With imports, VAT, selective taxes, and income tax appear, and this is when a relevant share of revenue is obtained in open economies. In addition, the taxpayer also perceives it as a unique process; in fact, evasion itself is more relevant in VAT, selective tax, and advance income than in the low tariffs, due to commercial opening.

Management of Data Services with Large-Scale Participation of the Private Sector

In terms of services to streamline the TA, it is important to consider outsourced Information management, using tools such as information in the cloud, security programming, or programming support. The acceleration of information technology and data science, such as generative artificial intelligence, will require TA leadership to stay up to date with new business models.

Another key element of management is computer security (cases of breaches relevant in countries of our region), with the consequent damage to tax secrecy and taxpayer privacy.

It is important to recognize that the creation of a data agency within the TAs of Latin America and the Caribbean also depends on the availability of information, which is currently limited.

On a domestic scale, this limitation is caused by the high levels of informality in economic activity. At the labor sphere, it can reach 55% of the region’s workers and is reflected in the high levels of evasion, in social security, and in income taxation, both for companies and individuals, with somewhat lower levels (around 30%) for VAT.

From an international point of view, although there have recently been major advances in international cooperation in the automatic exchange of financial information, in more than 100 complying countries, not all income is reached, and much less property, which limits the effective global direct taxation of taxpayers. For their part, the expected changes in international corporate taxation have stalled.

New Focus on Human Resources and Cultural Values in the Tax Administration

In the traditional TA, the stability and civil service labor framework generates a specialized civil service esprit de corps, based on the integrity, dedication, secrecy, and institutional loyalty of officials.

With the data agency, the ethos of the tax administration will evolve to incorporate characteristics such as a greater innovation initiative to achieve results (almost essential), the preponderance of career flexibility (also necessary), and a modus operandi that allows for a more autonomous work culture and is less dependent on career ladders.

To adapt to this new reality, the new data agency mission imposes changes in the management of TAs, fundamentally in four areas:

First, the personnel profile must change, to rebalance capabilities (further increasing the number of data science experts compared to those specialized in social sciences).

Second, recruiting strategies should focus on those trained in academia and less for law and auditing firms.

Third, the operational approach must be renewed, to shift from the traditional “pyramidal” hierarchical organization to a more “rhomboid” one because the application of modern technology increasingly requires greater specialization and teamwork to effectively manage the processes. Finally, it is necessary to create a new work culture that stimulates innovation and teamwork.

In summary, the TA will require a more open, horizontal, and flexible differential functional relationship to allow “collaborators” to keep pace with the private sector technological advances and generational change. This approach will not only improve the response capability of the TA but will also allow for more proactive management that is adaptable to changing realities.

Change in Governance within Tax Administrations

Another relevant evolution will be the governance of TAs to ensure greater transparency and responsibility in the use of private information.

If the data agency function grows within TAs, these institutions will be able to centralize a prominent level of socioeconomic information about citizens. It is important to have more democratic governance within these institutions, with transparency and accountability mechanisms.

This will be essential to keep the trust of taxpayers, society, and cooperating jurisdictions in the institution and in the consolidation of its function as a data agency.

This would mean different mechanisms to ensure fairness, for instance, having a Board of Directors with broad representation and autonomy, to protect taxpayer rights; enable “Citizen Oversight Offices” (Bogotá Chamber of Commerce, 2003); and create a specialized ombudsman complemented by special legislative controls, such as national security committees.

The management of tax information must also be consistent with other regulations related to the economic, political, and social power exercised by large companies and to privacy and protection of personal data. To ensure rights, the algorithms that will govern public policies, including tax inspection, must be transparent, which ensures that they do not come from discriminatory practices.

Finally, at the state level, it is crucial to prevent taxation, which provides tax revenue, from interfering with regulatory action. In short, that the state does not sacrifice the rights of users or promote discrimination due to its dependence on fiscal resources or the power of multinational mega-companies.

This article is translated from Spanish. The original English translation was published by the Inter-American Center of Tax Administrations (CIAT) and can be found here.

Subscribe to our newsletter to keep yourself updated about our latest publications, blogs and events. Make sure to select newsletters option, after choosing the fiscal policy and management topic.

Related Articles

The Global Minimum Tax is a Game Changer: Learn About the Main Tax Policy Trade-offs

Leveraging AI to Transform Macroeconomic and Fiscal Policymaking in Latin America and the Caribbean



Filed Under: Administración financiera y tributaria, Taxes, Uncategorized

Raul Zambrano

Ingeniero de sistemas, Raul Zambrano es el Director de Asistencia Técnica e Innovación del Centro Interamericano de Administraciones Tributarias – CIAT. Ha dirigido equipos internacionales multidisciplinarios en proyectos de modernización ejecutados por el CIAT en 8 países y ha participado mejorando procesos y desarrollando y evaluando sistemas de información como consultor en más de 20 administraciones tributarias y aduaneras. Ha dictado clases de bases de datos, gerencia de sistemas de información y orientación a objetos, en la Escuela Politécnica Nacional del Ecuador y en la Universidad San Francisco de Quito, y seminarios sobre tecnología y administración tributaria en varias universidades en América y Europa. Miembro de la TFDE de la Acción 1 de BEPS. Ha sido autor y editor de varias publicaciones en materia de administración tributaria y tecnología.

Santiago Díaz De Sarralde

Santiago Díaz de Sarralde Miguez, actual Director de Estudios e Investigaciones Tributarias en CIAT, es doctor en Economía y profesor titular de Economía Aplicada en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Además de su labor docente e investigadora ha desempeñado, entre otras, las funciones de: vice-decano de alumnos, relaciones internacionales y extensión universitaria en la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales; subdirector general de estudios tributarios en el Instituto de Estudios Fiscales; jefe del gabinete técnico del Secretario General de Financiación Territorial, director de estudios tributarios y estadísticas de la Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria; director de gabinete del Secretario de Estado de Hacienda y Presupuestos del Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda; y consultor de instituciones como el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo o el Banco Asiático de Desarrollo.

Alberto Barreix

Alberto Barreix is a fiscal consultant for CIAT and the IDB, where he was the Fiscal Principal Leader. At the IDB, he led technical assistance in fiscal reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. He has been a lecturer and researcher at the Schools of Government and Law, and a consultant in Asian countries at Harvard University, where he obtained a PhD, a master's degree in public administration, and another in international taxation. His contributions include co-authoring the semi-dual income tax, the personalized VAT (IVA P), and the equivalent fiscal pressure.

Martin Bès

Mr. Bès joined the IDB in 1993 as a country economist and worked on Bank-financed fiscal reform projects between 1994 and 2000. He served as Alternate Executive Director for Argentina and Haiti at the Boards of the IDB and the IIC between 2000 and 2012. Between 2014 and 2019, as Special Advisor at the Office of the Presidency, he led the IDB Group’s reform of Non-Sovereign Guaranteed operations, special projects and focused on group-wide coordination issues. He was the IDB Group’s Secretary between November 2019 and March 2021 and worked on tax policy and corporate issues until his retirement in March 2024. Before joining the Bank, Mr. Bès worked in economic and financial planning at the Argentine affiliate of Bunge Corporation, a global agribusiness firm. He worked as a consultant in several multilateral institutions in the areas of organizational design, strategic planning and fiscal studies between 2012 and 2014. Mr. Bès obtained a Master’s degree in International Public Policy from the School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and in Economics from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. His undergraduate degree is in Economics from the University of Buenos Aires.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

RECAUDANDO BIENESTAR

Welcome to the blog of the IDB’s Fiscal Management Division. This is the place where we talk about fiscal policy and management at the national and subnational levels in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Search

Recent Posts

  • Electronic Invoicing: A Latin American Innovation with Global Reach
  • Unveiling the Truth: How Sticking to Fiscal Rules Boosts Investment in Latin America
  • How Developing Countries Reduce the Impact of Climate Vulnerability on Sovereign Risk
  • Making Good Macro-Fiscal Forecasts for Medium-Term Fiscal Sustainability: Lessons from International Practice
  • Smart Public Procurement for Better Public Spending in Latin America and the Caribbean

Categories

  • Administración financiera y tributaria
  • Compras Públicas
  • Compras Públicas
  • Decentralization
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Gestión Fiscal
  • Política fiscal
  • Public Spending
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
To learn more about cookies, click here
x
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT