Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Sostenibilidad

Just another web-blogs Sites site

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Agriculture and Food Security
    • Climate change
    • Ecosystems and Biodiversity
    • Environmental and Social Safeguards
    • Infrastructure and Sustainable Landscapes
    • Institutionality
    • Responsible Production and Consumption
  • Authors
  • English
Indígenas

What does our new Environmental and Social Policy Framework entail for a project with Indigenous Peoples?

March 31, 2021 por Ivan Besserer - Lara Chinarro - Patricia Henriquez Leave a Comment


At the beginning of a project, we ask ourselves how it will improve the lives of beneficiaries. When these beneficiaries will be Indigenous Peoples, we also ask ourselves how development benefits and opportunities should be promoted in a culturally appropriate manner. This is precisely one of the objectives of the Environmental and Social Performance Standard on Indigenous Peoples (ESPS 7) of the IDB’s new Environmental and Social Policy Framework (ESPF). ESPS 7 establishes respect for the rights of Indigenous Peoples and seeks to avoid, minimize and/or compensate the project’s adverse impacts and risks. It also recognizes that they can be particularly vulnerable if their lands and natural resources are affected, or if their culture is threatened. 

To help you understand what ESPS 7 entails, we thought we would share a fictional example of its implementation. Said project aims to increase the productivity of the agricultural sector in the region, maintaining and promoting the sustainable use of natural resources. The project includes the construction of a research center to develop pilot programs and incentives to adopt new technologies for small and medium farmers. It also includes training for these farmers and for technical personnel from government sector entities. 

As part of the project’s environmental and social assessment prepared by the executing agency, with support from the IDB, we identified that the region’s population is 30% Indigenous, most of whom could be potential beneficiaries of planned activities. We also identified that an Indigenous community uses natural resources within the project’s area and adverse impacts, such as loss of access or restrictions on land use, could occur. Therefore, we carried out a sociocultural analysis. Among other aspects, this analysis included: 

  • The characterization of the Indigenous People 
  • The identification of risks and potential direct, indirect, and cumulative adverse impacts and their mitigation and/or compensation (culturally appropriate) measures, as well as the positive impacts 
  • A culturally appropriate, meaningful engagement plan, with free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), if necessary. In this case, due to the existence of this Indigenous community, we required the FPIC. 

Free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) 

The FPIC is one of the main incorporations of the new ESPF, given it is not expressly stated in the current Indigenous Peoples Policy (OP-765). It does, however, consider that, if there are significant adverse impacts affecting the physical, territorial, or cultural integrity of Indigenous Peoples, agreements must be made on the operation and on measures to manage those impacts. 

The FPIC builds on and expands the consultation and engagement process and is established through good faith negotiations between the executing agency and the Indigenous communities. Here consent refers to the collective support of Indigenous Peoples to carry out the project activities that affect them, reached through a culturally appropriate process that is respectful of their customary decision-making process and governance structure. It is required if there is any of these circumstances: 

  • Impacts on lands and natural resources traditionally owned or used by the community, 
  • Relocation of Indigenous Peoples from lands and natural resources traditionally owned or used, or 
  • Significant impacts on their cultural heritage 

The FPIC applies to project design, implementation and expected outcomes related to impacts affecting the Indigenous communities. In this FPIC process, we considered the following aspects, among others: 

  • The consultations were carried out in their language 
  • They were adequately informed before the meetings in a culturally appropriate format and language to ensure that everyone understood the project and its environmental and social assessment before participating in the discussion  
  • Their customary decision-making process and structure 

As part of the FPIC process, we reached certain agreements. For instance: 

  • Relocation of the research center to an accessible area, in which only a minor part of the project overlaps with the area used by the community, in accordance with their preference  
  • The research center’s construction hours were adjusted to the community’s use of the area 
  • Collaboration with a community committee to design trainings and for conducting participatory monitoring during construction and operation phases 

This process and agreements were properly documented. 

Results

Given we were able to identify the Indigenous community within the project area and others in the region as potential beneficiaries in a timely manner, we were able to implement early on the requirements of the new framework’s ESPS 7.  

The results of the sociocultural analysis and the FPIC process contributed to a better design and to the development of a robust and culturally appropriate Indigenous Peoples plan. A stakeholder engagement process was established that covered from the design of project activities to their implementation and closure, while empowering the communities. Regarding the project, community members increased the productivity of their land thanks to improved technology and training. Likewise, they incorporated community practices and traditional knowledge into the research center’s pilot programs. 

In addition to what we have explained thus far, ESPS 7 also highlights the special conditions of certain Indigenous Peoples, such as transborder peoples and those in isolation and initial contact. Similarly, it stresses the importance of an early, continuous, and culturally appropriate engagement with Indigenous Peoples. 

The ESPF systematizes socio-environmental management in a single framework and aligns the IDB with international best practices. To achieve compliance with its requirements and objectives, we suggest you start familiarizing yourself with it and identifying what aspects are new. The IDB, as part of the implementation of the new ESPF, will be developing trainings and capacity building activities for its personnel and for executing agencies, to whom the requirements of the different ESPSs are addressed.  

We encourage you to review the new ESPS on Indigenous Peoples and tell us what aspects you consider most relevant for the preparation and supervision of projects.  


This blog post is part of a series about the IDB‘s new Environmental and Social Policy Framework (ESPF). You may also want to read:

Three things you need to know about the IDB’s new Environmental and Social Policy Framework

Circular economy: Now or never


Filed Under: Environmental and Social Safeguards

Ivan Besserer

Ivan Besserer is a Sr. Social Development Specialist at the Environmental and Social Solutions Unit of the IDB, where he works on the management of social risks in operations and coordinates the development of guidance material for the new Environmental and Social Policy Framework (ESPF). At the IDB he was part of the Special Group for the Modernization of Environmental and Social Policies, housed within the President’s Office, and charged with developing the ESPF. Prior to joining the IDB, Ivan worked as a Social Development Specialist at the World Bank. He holds an M.Sc. in Democracy and Comparative Politics from University College London (UCL), where he was a Chevening Scholar.

Lara Chinarro

Lara Chinarro is the online course Program Manager for the Environmental and Social Solutions Unit of the Inter-American Development Bank. She holds a master's degree in Agronomic Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Madrid and another in Environmental Engineering and Water Management from the EOI Business School. Before joining the IDB, she worked at the World Bank to improve knowledge and capacity in environmental and agricultural projects in Latin America. Lara has worked in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Honduras, Peru, and Uruguay.

Patricia Henriquez

Patricia Henríquez is a social specialist from the IDB Environmental and Social Solutions Unit (ESG) with experience in project preparation and supervision. She is a lawyer and has an MSc in Environmental Policy and Regulation from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Previously she worked as a social safeguards consultant at the World Bank and before that at the Ministry of Environment in Peru in the office responsible for the management of socio-environmental conflicts.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

SEARCH

Sustainability

This blog is a space to reflect about the challenges, opportunities and the progress made by Latin American and Caribbean countries on the path towards the region’s sustainable development.

SIMILAR POSTS

  • Promoting sustainable development in Indigenous communities
  • The IDB’s new Environmental and Social Policy Framework in a nutshell
  • 4 facts about IDB’s standard on assessment and management of environmental and social risks and impacts
  • Four Things You Should Know about the Standard for the Evaluation and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts
  • The delicate relationship between human health and a healthy environment

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

    Blog posts written by Bank employees:

    Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


    For blogs written by external parties:

    For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

    The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

    Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



    Privacy Policy

    Derechos de autor © 2025 · Magazine Pro en Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

    Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

    Aviso Legal

    Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

    facebook
    twitter
    youtube
    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
    To learn more about cookies, click here
    x
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT