Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Gestión fiscal

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Decentralization
    • Public Spending
    • Taxes
  • authors
  • Publications
  • English
    • Español
Cómo medir el gasto público climático

How do we measure public spending to address climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean?

October 12, 2022 by Huáscar Eguino - Carlos Pimenta - Aloisio Lopes - Raúl Delgado Leave a Comment


A recent report released by the World Meteorological Organization paints a devastating picture of extreme weather events and the effects of climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean. Throughout the region, floods, droughts, heat waves, and hurricanes are killing hundreds of people, inflicting severe damage on infrastructure, and displacing population.

The situation is dire. Human activities are responsible for an average global temperature rise of approximately 1.1 °C above pre-industrial levels. While countries that are parties to the Paris Agreement have pledged to reduce emissions, these commitments are not enough to meet the Agreement’s targets.

Governments reached further agreements at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), but the situation remains precarious. Taking into account national climate commitments and other mitigation measures, the world is now on track for a global temperature rise of 2.7 °C by the end of the century. Such a rise could have an unprecedented impact on human and environmental systems, destroying ecosystems, displacing hundreds of millions of people, and generating enormous costs for the world’s economies and public finances.

If we want to combat climate change, one key step is to make sure all public and private financial flows are in line with the international objectives set out in the Paris Agreement. This will require developing funding mechanisms and information systems to identify, prioritize, and evaluate countries’ climate finance efforts, which hinges on first identifying and evaluating public spending on climate change in national budgets.

Classifying and identifying climate expenditures—a crucial step for countries

Identifying and tracking public climate expenditures helps ensure that such expenses are well managed in the first place. How so? Classifying climate expenditures reveals how much is being spent and on what. It also makes it easier to monitor and evaluate climate management, providing key information used to analyze fiscal risks tied to climate impacts and the transition to net-zero economies. Additionally, it is essential in order to slash public spending with negative or potentially negative climate impacts. What we need then is a consistent and coherent methodology that can be used to hold countries to their international commitments, evaluate the impacts of government action on climate change, and boost access to timely financing.

As great as this sounds, international policymakers have yet to agree on a methodology for identifying spending to address climate change. What’s more, efforts to regularly classify such spending are stymied by the limitations of countries’ public expenditure management and classification systems, as well as by the growing demand for information for sustainable development that adds complexity for data collection and classification.

For this reason, any proposed methodological framework must be compatible with the standard budget agency practices in the region. The ability to merely identify and classify climate expenditures is not enough—the methodology must also ensure that data is internationally comparable.

Being able to classify budget expenses and environmental activities is key to tracking information on public activity resources and expenditures. While countries in the region organize and classify statistical information using systems with varying levels of sophistication and specificity, all take their cues from international statistical standards for environmental and fiscal information, such as the System of National Accounts (SNA), the System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA), and the IMF’s Government Finance Statistics (GFS) framework.

One highly useful standard is the Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG), which can be used to analyze spending trends by purpose. Included in the IMF’s 2014 Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies, the COFOG breaks down data on government expenditure into ten main categories according to their function, or purpose. It can thus serve as an analytical framework to assess how governments respond to society’s needs through public spending. However, we still lack a sufficiently detailed functional classification to identify all climate-related public spending, due to the cross-cutting nature of climate issues.

Climate public expenditure: a definition

Generally speaking, climate public expenditure can be defined as spending that seeks to address climate change or its impacts through actions such as mitigation or adaptation. In other words, climate spending is any spending that is mainly or ultimately aimed at responding to the climate crisis. But there are other expenditures whose main purpose isn’t to address climate change, but which—due to the technical nature of the activities implemented—nonetheless have significant impacts on climate management. There are also expenditures that respond to major climate impacts such as natural disasters associated with extreme weather events. We can consider the latter two as indirect climate expenditures, or expenditures with knock-on effects on climate policy.

This brings us to a fundamental methodological dilemma at the heart of countries’ climate action and systems for classifying expenditures by function. The current classification system fails to capture indirect or secondary actions or expenditures whose main objective isn’t climate change mitigation or adaptation—such as investments in renewable energies or public transportation—but which are nonetheless important for policymakers.

What we need is a methodology capable of identifying and classifying climate expenditures according to the logic of current classification systems and compatible with these systems, but that can also provide policymakers with climate spending information that isn’t boxed in by strict definitions based on main purpose or ultimate motivation.

A new IDB methodology to identify and classify climate public expenditure

With this objective in mind, the IDB recently developed a methodology for classifying climate expenditures that is both in line with international standards and compatible with the budgeting practices of countries in the region. Specifically, the methodology proposes grounding climate expenditure classification in the current structure of the COFOG system by using a double-entry functional classification matrix that takes into account both the primary and secondary purpose of climate expenditures, following the analytical approach of satellite accounting.

Under this methodology, countries design their own classification systems to obtain the inputs needed to track climate spending, evaluate it, and provide feedback on their budget formulation processes in order to optimize climate spending effectiveness and efficiency. The IDB has had success applying this methodology in Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, and Jamaica, which we cover in other posts on this blog.

The methodology is just one of the spokes of the IDB’s institutional strategy to accelerate the region’s economic recovery through fiscal policies that increase its resilience to extreme weather events and attract green investment. As part of this effort, the IDB and the German government launched a $20 million fund at COP26 to strengthen green fiscal policies in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The methodology developed by the IDB was carefully designed to supply policymakers with the information they need to promote green fiscal policies. While climate change presents enormous challenges for the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, the ability to identify and monitor public spending on climate change will be an invaluable tool for improving climate management and, above all, putting a price tag on what inaction would mean for the region.

Download the Conceptual Framework for Classifying Public Spending on Climate Change in Latin American and the Caribbean [Spanish only]

Learn more about the IDB’s work on fiscal management and climate change.

Related blog posts

Five reasons why COP26 is an important event for finance ministers [Spanish only]

What are the fiscal risks of extreme climate events and how to we address them? [Spanish only]

Further reading

Climate Change Public Budget Tagging: Connections across Financial and Environmental Classification Systems

Fiscal Policy and Climate Change: Recent Experiences of Finance Ministries in Latin America and the Caribbean


Filed Under: Gasto Público, Gestión Fiscal Tagged With: América Latina, cambio climatico, Climate change

Huáscar Eguino

Huáscar Eguino is a Senior Consultant in the Fiscal Management Division of the IDB. He is an economist specialized in fiscal policies and climate change, subnational public finance, and public investment management. During his more than 20 years of experience as an IDB specialist, he worked directly with 17 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, advised more than 75 subnational governments, and coordinated the development of two emerging issues at the IDB: fiscal policy and climate change and subnational fiscal management. Currently, he works as a consultant providing advice and supporting the development of financial and knowledge products on fiscal policy and climate change matters. He holds a master’s degree in Development Studies from the Institute of Social Studies of the University of Rotterdam, and postgraduate studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, University of Pennsylvania, and the University of the Andes. In addition, he holds more than 10 professional certifications in fiscal policy and climate change and public finance. He is (co-)author of more than 20 publications in the IDB that have exceeded more than 120 thousand downloads.

Carlos Pimenta

Carlos Pimenta is a Principal Specialist in the IDB's Fiscal Management Division. He has more than 25 years of experience in matters of modernization of public management, including 8 years in the Government in Brazil, 5 in private consultancies and 13 in the IDB, where he led public management reform projects in more than 10 countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. During the 90s in Brazil he held the positions of Executive Secretary of the Council for State Reform, National Secretary in the Ministry of Administration and State Reform, President of the National School of Public Administration, and Vice-minister of Labor and of the Public administration. He has degrees in public administration and a master's in public management from the Getulio Vargas Foundation in Brazil. Currently he concentrates his work mainly in the areas of public financial management.

Aloisio Lopes

Aloisio Lopes is a senior consultant in the Climate Change Division of the IDB. He worked in the development of financing instruments and in the formulation, management, and evaluation of programs for the environment, climate change, agriculture and social development in the Ministry of Finance and other agencies of the Federal Government of Brazil for 19 years. He holds a bachelor's degree in agronomic engineering, a master's degree in economic development and agriculture, and specializations in public policy management and climate change economics.

Raúl Delgado

Raúl Delgado is a Lead Specialist in Climate Change at the IDB, where he participates in the planning and execution of the agenda of the Climate Change Division. He also leads the NDC Invest Platform, which is the collective effort of the IDB Group to support the implementation of the Paris Agreement, assisting countries in the design and implementation of their policies, goals and commitments related to climate change. An economist, he has extensive experience in public policies, multilateral financing, and structuring of public projects, having worked in the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit of Mexico for over 18 years. Raúl led the institutional strategy and the coordination of credit activities and technical assistance with international financial institutions. During that time (2007-2011 and 2015-2017) he was also the Focal Point and Member of the Council of Mexico for the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and Member of the Board of the Green Climate Fund, as well as a focal point for the Climate Investment Funds. Between 2011-2014 he held the position of Senior Advisor to the Executive Director of Mexico at the IDB.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

RECAUDANDO BIENESTAR

Welcome to the blog of the IDB’s Fiscal Management Division. This is the place where we talk about fiscal policy and management at the national and subnational levels in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Search

Recent Posts

  • Electronic Invoicing: A Latin American Innovation with Global Reach
  • Unveiling the Truth: How Sticking to Fiscal Rules Boosts Investment in Latin America
  • How Developing Countries Reduce the Impact of Climate Vulnerability on Sovereign Risk
  • Making Good Macro-Fiscal Forecasts for Medium-Term Fiscal Sustainability: Lessons from International Practice
  • Smart Public Procurement for Better Public Spending in Latin America and the Caribbean

Categories

  • Administración financiera y tributaria
  • Compras Públicas
  • Compras Públicas
  • Decentralization
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Gestión Fiscal
  • Política fiscal
  • Public Spending
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

Blog posts written by Bank employees:

Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


For blogs written by external parties:

For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

Aviso Legal

Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

facebook
twitter
youtube
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser.
To learn more about cookies, click here
x
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT