Inter-American Development Bank
facebook
twitter
youtube
linkedin
instagram
Abierto al públicoBeyond BordersCaribbean Development TrendsCiudades SosteniblesEnergía para el FuturoEnfoque EducaciónFactor TrabajoGente SaludableGestión fiscalGobernarteIdeas MatterIdeas que CuentanIdeaçãoImpactoIndustrias CreativasLa Maleta AbiertaMoviliblogMás Allá de las FronterasNegocios SosteniblesPrimeros PasosPuntos sobre la iSeguridad CiudadanaSostenibilidadVolvamos a la fuente¿Y si hablamos de igualdad?Home
Citizen Security and Justice Creative Industries Development Effectiveness Early Childhood Development Education Energy Envirnment. Climate Change and Safeguards Fiscal policy and management Gender and Diversity Health Labor and pensions Open Knowledge Public management Science, Technology and Innovation  Trade and Regional Integration Urban Development and Housing Water and Sanitation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Caribbean Development Trends

  • HOME
  • CATEGORIES
    • Agribusiness
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • Barbados
    • BehaviorChange
    • Belize
    • Bermuda
    • biodiversity
    • Blockchain
    • Caribbean
    • Caribbean Culture and Media
    • Climate Change
    • Creative Economy
    • Crime Prevention and Citizen Security
    • Data and Knowledge
    • De-risking
    • Dominica
    • Dutch
    • Early Childhood Development
    • Economic Growth
    • Education Policy
    • energy
    • entrepreneurship
    • Environmental and Climate Change
    • Events
    • Extractives
    • Finance
    • Fiscal Rules
    • gender
    • Governance and Regulatory Policy Reforms
    • Grenada
    • Guyana
    • Haiti
    • Health
    • Health Policy
    • Hurricane
    • Hurricane Irma
    • infrastructure
    • Innovation and change
    • Intellectual Property
    • IWD
    • Jamaica
    • JumpCaribbean
    • Labor
    • Labour Markets
    • MOOC
    • Music
    • Natural Disasters
    • Nurturing Institutions
    • OECS
    • Podcast
    • Poverty
    • Private Sector and Entrepreneurship
    • Saint Kitts and Nevis
    • Saint Lucia
    • Saint Vincent and Grenadines
    • skills
    • Sports for Development
    • Suriname
    • Technology
    • The Bahamas
    • The Blue Economy
    • Transportation
    • Tourism
    • Trinidad and Tobago
    • Uncategorized
    • VAWG
    • Webinar
    • women
    • Women for Change
    • youth
  • Country Offices
    • Bahamas
    • Barbados
    • Guyana
    • Jamaica
    • Suriname
    • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Press Releases
    • Bahamas
    • Barbados
    • Guyana
    • Jamaica
    • Suriname
    • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Authors

EPO for development…Does it work? Is it legal?

August 19, 2014 by Marcello Basani Leave a Comment


 

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a hormone produced by the kidney that promotes and stimulates the formation of red blood cells by the bone marrow. The resulting rise in red cells increases the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. We as people need oxygen. We as athletes (yes, I still considered myself an athlete, though I manage to run only 20 miles per week) need a lot of oxygen! What a great thing this EPO is: if we get a little more in our organism, we can break out of our physical limits! With greater efficiency! And a lot of athletes seem to think in the same way!

Now, can you imagine having a performance-enhancer for development projects? Of course, also in this case we would need a fancy acronym, which is something the international community is very good in providing. In fact, there are quite a few already available, including: RBF (results based financing); P4P (payment for performance); PBF (performance based financing), which in turns inject oxygen into innovative contracting modalities, such as PBC (performance based contracting) and OBC (Output-based contract). See GPOBA for More & Juicy Acronyms – M&JA!

In a few words, RBF is a financing mechanism that, within a given timeframe, links (at least a part of the) payments, and/or subsidies to the achievement of previously determined performance targets, outputs or outcomes. Yes, you can call this a paradigm shift (oh how I love this expression), since traditional contracts used in the water and sanitation sector tend to focus more on inputs or the contractor’s responsibilities (e.g. to build a treatment plant) rather than outputs or outcomes related to operational and/or financial performance (e.g. volumes of treated water). As the International Water Association teaches us, key features that differentiate PBCs from more traditional service contracts include:

  • Higher value for money – the performance risk lies with the contractor and full remuneration is contingent upon verifiable improvements to performance or service levels.
  • Greater flexibility for the contractor – PBC is not prescriptive. The contractor decides which measures to undertake in order to achieve its targets, leaving room for possible creative solutions and innovation.
  • Fairer risk allocation – The performance and reputational risk is distributed based on local circumstances, and is reflected in the payment mechanism.

To date, PBCs for targeted service contracts have been used mostly for reducing levels of non-revenue water (NRW). And this is exactly what happened in the Bahamas, where with an eye on the goal of making its water supply system more efficient, the Bahamas Water and Sewerage Corporation (WSC) embarked in an ambitious program funded by an Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) to address the problem of non-revenue water and fix the relationship between the utility and its customers, which had been deteriorating during the years.

For three decades, WSC had been trying to provide New Providence’s 250,000 residents with reliable quality service but with limited success. In 2012, with about 58% of the water entered into the utility’s distribution system lost before reaching customers, WSC determined that only an integrated, comprehensive approach could solve these problems – through a PBC. The project needed some additional EPO. That is how a PBC was signed with an international group, linking a portion of the remuneration to the NRW level in time.  

Preliminary results from the program are incredibly encouraging. Sales are set to increase and water into supply is going down. Eureka! (More blogs will follow!)

The bad news is: injecting additional EPO in the system is dangerous (and illegal)! Bugger. Too bad. The reason that EPO is dangerous is because of increased blood viscosity. Above a certain hematocrit level whole blood can sludge and clog capillaries, compromising our capacity to function and causing strokes and heart attacks.

From a similar (though indisputably stretched) perspective, results-based finance cannot be considered a panacea for the water sector. PBC can indeed help a utility to aim for higher service levels and increase operational efficiency; as long as some key factors within the contract are carefully pondered and analyzed, including:

  • Structuring remuneration, which usually combines fixed payments with variable payments, since a full transfer of risk to the contractor (e.g. through 100% variable remuneration) is unrealistic. But how much should be the fixed payment? How shall the fixed payment include “unknown” factors that could affect the achievement of the targets? Together with quantifiable the targets, the contract must clearly spell out the expected inputs tied to the fixed payment. Which is not as straightforward as it sounds!
  • Risk allocation, which should take into consideration elements of both the country and the utility context (quality of available information, governance issues, and expectations for utility staff collaboration, among others). But how to estimate that? Hard negotiations are expected!
  • Baseline date and setting targets. This is the core of the contract: where do we start from and where do we want to reach. The data provided at inception by the utility must be reliable. An independent, third party may also be employed to verify it. At the same time, performance targets must be set, balancing (a) ‘achievability’ with (b) being ambitious. Again, not that easy.

The preliminary results from Bahamas are very encouraging. This can indeed become an interesting successful case study for the future.

However, even with a solid contract, efficiency gains achieved through PBCs will only be maintained through an appropriate institutional and governance structure that promotes transparency and accountability. So many things to consider with PBF! And we thought it was as easy as getting some additional EPO in the system?! Any cycler who can assist us?  (O.U.C.H.!)

 


Filed Under: Economy & Investment, Social Systems, The Bahamas Tagged With: growth, International Water Association, output-based contract, panacea, payment for performance, performance based contracting, performance based financing, results based financing, risk allocation, water utility

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

Subscribe

Search

Caribbean Dev Trends

We provide unique and timely insights on the Caribbean and its political, social, and economic development. At the IDB, we strive to improve lives in the Caribbean by creating vibrant and resilient economies where people are safe, productive and happy.

Similar posts

  • Suriname’s electricity company transitions to a digital and intelligent utility
  • Every Drop Counts! Jamaica’s Non-Revenue Water Program cops Global Award
  • Moving towards better potable water services
  • World Water Day
  • The Rupununi Innovation Fund – helping small enterprises in Guyana’s Rupununi

Footer

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
facebook
twitter
youtube
youtube
youtube

    Blog posts written by Bank employees:

    Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank ("IDB"). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) license and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC- IGO license. Note that link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.


    For blogs written by external parties:

    For questions concerning copyright for authors that are not IADB employees please complete the contact form for this blog.

    The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDB, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.

    Attribution: in addition to giving attribution to the respective author and copyright owner, as appropriate, we would appreciate if you could include a link that remits back the IDB Blogs website.



    Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

    Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo

    Aviso Legal

    Las opiniones expresadas en estos blogs son las de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan las opiniones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, sus directivas, la Asamblea de Gobernadores o sus países miembros.

    facebook
    twitter
    youtube